Mainnavigation

    • Bachelor
    • Master
    • Major-Minor
    • PhD Centre
    • Continuing Education
    • Preparatory training
    • Zurich Dance Academy
    • Toni Campus
    • Media and Information Centre
    • Museum für Gestaltung
    • Musikklub Mehrspur
    • Theater der Künste goes «The Valley»
    • Kino Toni
    • The University
    • Toni Campus
    • Teaching
    • Research
    • International
    • ZHdK digital
    • Sustainability
    • Zurich Centre for Creative Economies (ZCCE)
    • Press office
    • Jobs
    • Alumni
    • ZHdK Foundation
    • Z-Kubator
    • Immersive Arts Space
    • Intranet
    • Performing Arts and Film
    • Design
    • Fine Arts
    • Cultural Analysis
    • Music
    • News
    • Annual report 2024
    • Study Projects
    • Research Projects
    • Output directory
    • DIZH
    • Events
    • People
    • Podcasts
    • DE
    • EN
  • Watchlist
  • Menu Menu
You are here:
  1. Research Projects
More: Research Projects

A Pladoyer for Interpretive Pluralism.

Musical Praxis and the Ambiguity of the Musical Work

The focus of the project is musicalinterpretation in the context of classical music. The main thesis is  that the musical works are aesthetically overdetermined and that theirpotential can therefore only be actualized through a plurality of different (sometimes asthetically incomaptible) interpretations.

1.Brief Description

The subject of this project lies in an understanding of the notion of musical interpretation, first described as interpretative pluralism—a de facto inquiry accepted in musical practice (especially in the realm of classical music). Second, it justifies this fact through the analysis of the relationship between score and interpretation—a de jure inquiry. Finally, it advocates the thesis that the interpreter of classical music plays a maieutic role by actualizing aesthetic dispositions of the musical work.

2. The Four Research Directions of the Project

The project develops through four research directions:

a. The musical direction: Based on analyses of interpretations and scores, the project aims to support the developed argument. It seeks to bridge the perceived gap between theory and practice. The goal is not solely to apply theoretical paradigms but to develop concepts and thinking that can produce new insights into practice.

b. The interpretative direction: The results aim to formulate and articulate the role of the musical interpreter and interpreters in performing arts. It seeks to allow interpretative pluralism and hermeneutical normativity to coexist and to justify, providing criteria (a posteriori) for evaluating interpretations without implying that a musical work can only be interpreted in one, ideal way.

c. The artistic direction: The analysis aims to justify the aesthetic ambiguity of the musical work, potentially applicable to other aesthetic domains, particularly in performing arts.

d. The aesthetic direction: The project asserts and justifies distinctions between musical interpretation and musical performance, as well as between musical interpretation and musical understanding. It seeks to justify the aesthetic ambiguity of the musical work through a specific declination of aesthetic realism.

3. Target Audience

The four research directions of the project potentially appeal to four target groups at the ZHdK:

a. Music interpreters, who can engage with concrete examples of musical interpretations to reflect on their hermeneutic practice.

b. Interpreters in other artistic domains who can contemplate the function and modality of interpretation in their respective fields from the analyses.

c. Artist (particularly inthe domain of performin arts) which vcan reflect on the relation between artwork and possible interpretation, in a pluralistic, still normatively regulated way.

d. Aesthetic and art philosophical researchers who can draw insights on the role of the interpreter in art from the analyses presented.

4. Outcomes

a. Publications: The primary outcome will be a monograph in English presenting an articulated theory of musical interpretation. Additionally, other contributions and articles will present themes and theses of the project.

b. Conferences: The project aims to present its developed themes and theses in various international conferences.

c. Collaboration with other institutions (e.g., the Musicological Institute of UZH and/or the Universities of Bern and Basel).

 

5. Bibliography (Selection)

Bar-Elli, G. (2002) “Ideal Performance”, The British Journal of Aesthetics 42/3: 223–242.

Briesen, J. (2020) Ästhetische Urteile und ästhetische Eigenschaften, Vittorio Klostermann.

Budd, M. (2008) “The Acquaintance Principle” in Budd. M Aesthetic Essays, Oxford University Press: 48–61.

Compton, E. A. Z. (2012) A Dispositional Account of Aesthetic Properties, ProQuest LLC.

Cook, N. (1987) A Guide to Musical Analysis, Oxford University Press.

—— (2014) Beyond the Score: Music as Performance, Oxford University Press.

Danuser, H., (1994) “Interpretation” in Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Bärenreiter, IV S. 1053-1069

—— (2016) "Execution—Interpretation—Performance: The History of a Terminological Conflict" in De Assis,

Davies, S. (1991) “The Ontology of Musical Works and the Authenticity of their Performances”, Noûs, 25/1: 21–41.

—— (2003) “The Multiple Interpretability of Musical Works” in Themes in the Philosophy of Music, Oxford University Press: 245–263.

De Assis, P. (2018) Logic of Experimentation: Reshaping Music Performance in and through Artistic Research, Leuven University Press

Ganche, E. (1921) Frédéric Chopin : Sa vie et ses oeuvres, 1810-1849, Mercure de France.

Ingarden, R. (1989) Qu’est-ce qu’une œuvre musicale, Christian Bourgois Éditeur.

Krausz, Michael (1993) Rightness and Reasons – Interpretation in Cultural Practices, Cornell University Press

Levinson. J., (1990) “Aesthetic Supervenience” in Levinson, J., Music, Art and Metaphysics, Cornell University Press: 134–158

Mumford, S. et Anjum, R.L. (2018) “Powers and Potentiality,” in: Engelhard, K. et Quante, M. (ed.), Handbook of Potentiality, Springer: 261278.

Reicher, M. E. (2015) Einführung in die philosophische Ästhetik, WBG.

Ridley, A., (2003) “Against Musical Ontology”, The Journal of Philosophy 100/4 : 203–220.

Rosen (1972) The Classical Style, W. W. Norton & Company.

Ruta, M (2020) “Ontology of Music and Authenticity –A Pragmatic Approach” in Claviez, T. Imesch, K., Sweers, B. (Eds.), A Critique of Authenticity, Vernon Press: 159-181.

Siegmund, J. (2022) “Musik als Tätigsein oder: Was bedeutet Verantwortung von Subjekten in musikalischen

Beziehungen?” in Feige, D. M., Nieden, G. zur (Hg.) Musik und Subjektivität, Transcript.

Simoniti, V. (2017) “Aesthetic Properties as Powers”, European Journal of Philosophy 25/4: 1434–1453.

Vetter, B. (2013) “Multi-Track Dispositions,” The Philosophical Quarterly 63/251: 330352.

—— (2014) “Dispositions without Conditionals”, Mind 123/4: 129–156.

—— (2015) Potentiality, Oxford University Press.

 

Details

  • Research Focus
    • FSP Ästhetik
  • Project Lead
    • Judith Siegmund (FSP Ästhetik)
  • Team
    • Marcello Ruta (FSP Ästhetik)
  • Duration

    01.06.2022 – 30.06.2024

  • Financing
    • Interne Projektfinanzierung ZHdK (01.06.2022 – 30.12.2024)
  • Research Approaches
    • Basic research
    • Artistic-scientific research
  • Disciplines

    Art Education, Fine Arts, Music, Transdisciplinary, Other

  • Keywords

    Hermeneutik, Überdeterminierung, Musikwerk, Interpretationsforschung, Ästhetik, Musik

  • More Links
    • Glenn Gould Betrachtungen über verschiedene Arten des Musizierens und seine Schätzung der interpretativen Einstellung von Swjatoslaw Richter - mit Abschnitten von Richters Interpretationen der letzten Schubert Klaviersonaten.
    • Leonard Bernsteins Norton Lectures (1974) - Lecture 4: "The Delights and Dangers of Ambiguity" - Abschnitt über Mahlers Adagietto
  • Downloads
    • Präsentation_Basel_Eikones_2023
    • Beitrag in Sammelband: Körtner, Ulrich H.J., Tietz, Christiane (Hrsg.),Ethik in der Hermeneutik - Hermeneutik in der Ethik, Schöning, 2022