Mainnavigation

      • DE
      • EN
    • Watchlist
    • Menu Menu
    You are here:
    1. Research
    2. Institute for Contemporary Art Research
    More: Institute for Contemporary Art Research

    Salmo Suyo: "Talking with the swiss" (2019-2024)

    "Chang and Huang, 1984" (2021), drawing intervention on print. Credits: Salmo Suyo
    "Chang and Huang, 1984" (2021), drawing intervention on print. Credits: Salmo Suyo
      • Portrait Portrait

      The first part of this publication is comprised of notes addressed to trans people living in Switzerland. The initial objective of this publication was to create a communication network that brought together activists, artists, institutions, medical professionals, and individuals involved with transmasculine experiences for a series of conversations. It highlights gender incongruence (or gender dysphoria) as a starting point within the context of the Swiss art scene and beyond it. We discuss artistic and curatorial processes, doctor-patient/consumer relationships, activism, and economic and social dependencies between all of us. The entire catalog, and particularly the visual components, reference my personal experiences while living in Lima and use strategies of self-criticism as a tool for self-learning. Please note: one thing does not negate the other.

      As part of this process, very relevant encounters were born for the development of my work: both collaborations and ruptures. I spoke all year about trans-masculinity as an achievement that I would have to renounce or mask in such a way that it stops being a threat. I directly relate this to my personal interest in being in Switzerland for its promise of progress, education, security, an affect of cool; a destination disguised with many opportunities, though perhaps that promise is not accessible to many, if to me at all.

      In constructing the first part of the catalog, I offer five initial chapters:

      • Scope (commercial and social information about the Swiss context, medical system and some institutional dialogues).
      • Talk (notes, thoughts, provocations, lies, and personal conclusions from individual discussions).
      • Red Frames (documents and images I want to censor or protect, as well as images I would like to create in the future).

      The second part of this publication outlines the chronology of three projects that have evolved together: Dysphoria (2019-2024), Transsexual Ministry (2020โ€“ongoing), and Low(v)er Engadin (2024โ€“ongoing), all with a focus on the physical transition to transmasculinity and Switzerland as my next destination.

      โ€˜Talking with the Swissโ€™ is a journey through Switzerland, where I am a student, a guest, vaguely supported, often unwelcome, forced to be vegetarian and a user of Bumble and OkCupid apps. I speak of the toxic relationship I maintain with Switzerland; thatโ€™s why I choose to orient from Zurich and not Cusco. I see Zurich as the pinnacle of the trans bourgeoisie, because it encompasses a life of luxury, resources, and knowledge. Here, I have seen extractivism at its peak. Where, from my perspective, being trans is awarded a privileged status. And when I encountered this in Zurich, I was dazzled.

      Since the end of 2019, from afar, until the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, I have been drawing, thinking, yearning, and mentally conversing with artists and people who live in or have passed through Switzerland. This is why I frame all of my recent work under the title โ€˜Talking with the Swissโ€™, as a heading for a period in which I have also worked on and continue to work on โ€˜Disforiaโ€™, โ€˜Transsexual Ministryโ€™, and โ€˜Low(v)er Engadinโ€™.

      In 2024, I managed to meet many people through this proposal, addressing topics such as transmasculinity, porch aesthetics, free transition, white education. Going deeper into these subjects, I was interested in discussing the social and economic aspects of integrating into the art market, transitioning legally/physically, claiming community, exoticization, taking advantage of nationalist sentiment, and negotiations with educational and/or artistic institutions.

      Adding to the mix is the decline of progress or acceptance that many artists from the Global South have or had in seeking out to make their lives in European destinations, especially Switzerland (myself included). After the pandemic, the global colonial apparatus explicitly and radically affected the contemporary art context for artists, who face pressures to adhere to institutional agendas. The world became more sensitized, and discourses today are shifting towards restitution, repair, and the romanticizing of poverty, starting to look inward, perhaps for the first time. And just as these developments send artists from the Global South northwards, artists from my generation are leaving Europe and the USA to go live in the Sacred Valley, in Cuzco, a move which can be read both as ideological and as a strategy for increasing visibility.

      โ€˜Talking with the Swissโ€™ provides a picture I have yet to see of transmasculine experiences, including other peopleโ€™s transmasculine experiences. This publication is situated at an uncomfortable juncture because it seeks to accommodate various political positions between different fields that ideologically do not communicate with each other. Talking about personal confessions and privilege is challenging to all parties. It makes us vulnerable and puts our work and reputations at risk.

      After almost a year of gathering conversations and questioning statements and certainties about transmasculine people, mainly in Zurich, I conclude that without recognition or money, there is no interest, commitment, sense of debt, and much less a responsibility to share and circulate this information. A person from Peru asking to speak with someone from Switzerland or living in Switzerland about โ€œart and genderโ€ is far more complicated than one might imagine. For that reason, I called the first part of the publication โ€œOperation Scamโ€

      because whereas the path for Global North artists to work with Global South artists is completely possible and well trodden, the reverse does not apply.

      I refrain from publishing most of the conversations, as they were framed by superficiality, distrust, and the repetition of politically correct phrases, to which I too had to adapt at some point in order to be accepted. I do not only attribute this to the hierarchy of power, but also to the fact that knowledge about us (transmasculine people) is very recent, new and fresh, and we are in a moment of constructing its leap from theoretics into actualization. I am interested in trying to go beyond the polarized reductionism of supporting or opposing medical and social changes. Self-criticism is also possible, and I remain optimistic about it. Finally, this catalog allows me to point out aspects that perhaps today we are not ready to engage but which we can confront in the future, as an important piece to understanding the full picture.

      I am deeply grateful to those who invited and allowed me to fall in love with Switzerland. Capitalism and love have taken control of my being.

      As a finding, I believe that in order to achieve better results and fulfill my initial proposal, I had to commit various resources and strategies that I wasn't willing to negotiate from the beginning. This ensured that the project maintained its original focus: to make power relations transparent, even in research or artistic processes, and to make different perspectives visible. However, from the start of the project, I had two options: work with a person who would represent a male trans community, both internal and external to ZHdK, a doctor, and an activist or activist institution. With these people, I would obtain a deeper dialogue, ensuring a greater level of commitment from the participants. But I chose the second option because it would allow me to discover more, to understand what people here think, and I was more excited by the idea of not having complete clarity about what would happen.

      The second option is what I pursued for over a year: contacting various students from different departments of ZHdK, people working in activist institutions, doctors, curators, and others involved in general. In this way, with the amount of exchange, ruptures, and collaborations, I created a work that served as the initial bold base of the proposal. I believe I was able to map a network of contacts in relation to the project. But the final result is 50%. The diversity of voices and what it brings complexity to the project, unfocusing it, and I had to reconsider what is most important for me to make visible in the final publication. I believe that I have not finished the publication, and for the next stage, I would take the first option while maintaining the same perspective.