I am absolutely convinced that works of art are not “evil” in themselves. Works of art have no “agency.” They are always used—for instance, instrumentalized for propaganda purposes or by individuals for their own ends. A work of art only takes effect through the context in which it is placed and through its viewers.
Amid today’s fear and uncertainty, many people are resorting to fixed categories to shield themselves. However, the ambivalence and ambiguity inherent in art can be difficult to bear. Contemporary art is therefore often perceived as too problematic or complex. But interesting art is usually ambiguous. Accepting this ambiguity as a viewer can be challenging, as can the responsibility of actively interpreting works. That responsibility lies partly with us. The dialogue between artwork, artist and audience is a complex interplay of forces.
Today, taking position often eclipses debate. Downright “wars of words” are emerging that often have little to do with reality. Such pigeonholing damages the power of art. Art has the transformative power to open up new perspectives. It must not be misused to close off perspectives. I advocate a differentiated approach: we should not trivialize the ambivalence of art, but discuss its complexity in each individual case—not with fear, but with due caution.